It's the Shots
Dr. Peter McCullough dismantles the myths around myocarditis
This post is on the April 15, 2024 session of the IPAK-EDU Director’s Science Webinar featuring the work of Dr. Peter A. McCullough.
Check the Short Cuts section on the home page for the full clip archive.
The last three years have made myocarditis very nearly a household word.
By the time a disease rises to the level of popular consciousness, more often than not, a couple of things come along for the ride: 1) big money flows in and out of the biomedical complex, and 2) messaging on the disease becomes carefully managed and propagandized.
Neither phenomena are necessarily beneficial for health or patient care. For the former, the pursuit of profit has been demonstrated time and time again to be at odds with rigor, transparency, honesty, and product safety; for the latter, highly controlled and designed messaging—both commercial and institutional—are often weaponized against the public, in the interest of shaping the acceptance of the goals of the power structure lurking behind the biomedical complex.
One thing the last 4 years should teach us: this is not about public health or the public interest.
As soon as myocarditis (and pericarditis) showed up as a safety signal in connection with the COVID injectable products, perception-control messaging went into high gear. It isn’t unrealistic to imagine that this effort was scripted well in advance. Very early on, following the rollout of the jabs to the public, Pfizer’s own clinical trial documentation had clearly identified heart damage as a potential outcome of the jabs.
As an example, in Pfizer’s own Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports from April 2021, myocarditis is listed repeatedly as an ‘ADVERSE EVENT OF SPECIAL INTEREST’; myocarditis and pericarditis are cited among the most frequently reported immune-mediated/autoimmune events following the jab.
They knew.
Early on.
This wasn’t ignorance.
Brain-worms
Reuters Fact Check (predictably) deployed the brain-worms: the intended takeaway was that ‘Adverse Events of Special Interest’ are not ‘confirmed side effects’ and ‘the vast majority…are not eventually confirmed.” Never mind that there was inadequate safety study and no long term experience with these injectables.
There is no need for caution when the desired endpoint is “just take the shots”.
It should be stressed here that Reuters routinely publishes ‘fact-checks’ that support the interests of companies financially connected to Reuters. The conflicts of interest are rife and blatant. Take, for example, James C. Smith, who sits on the Pfizer Board of Directors, and just by chance also happens to be Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation and President and CEO of Thomson Reuters.
But Reuters was far from alone. Their efforts to propagandize the public were enjoined by nearly every popular media outlet across the globe.
If you appreciate the content, please consider giving this post a like. It's a simple gesture that doesn't cost a thing, but it goes a long way in promoting this post, spreading this content, and bringing awareness and understanding to others who might benefit. You are awesome. Be awesome.
The strategy was simple and widespread, and thereby, effective. Like most propaganda campaigns, the simplicity of the message sits in a morass of perceived chaos, and preys on overwhelm and intellectual laziness. That is not an indictment of ordinary folks. It’s simply part of the reality of living in the crises of now: all of us are under a constant chaotic barrage of advertising, misinformation, intentional confusion and seeded contradictions. When fear and intimidation are added to the mix, manipulation gets a turbo-boost.
The brain-worms soon metastacized into an expanding and evolving web, constructed to hem in the questioning mind. The claims, which morphed in parallel to reports of harm, included:
risk of post-jab myocarditis has been exaggerated, October 2021
post-jab myocarditis isn’t irreversible, November 2021
the number of adolescents with post-jab myocarditis is ‘very low’, December 2021
The American Heart Association foisted perhaps the most influential and oft-repeated brain-worm. Succinctly, the message was: “COVID-19 infection poses higher risk for myocarditis than vaccines”.
This messaging model has been directed at a great many of the most concerning adverse reactions associated with the COVID injectable products. The core brain-worm droned into the public was and continues to be:
“Worry more about COVID, the ‘vaccine’ is SAFE and EFFECTIVE.”
What Does the Evidence Say?
Enter Dr. Peter McCullough.
Despite the attacks sustained on his academic positions, board certifications, and reputation over the last four years, his credentials testify to his expertise. His calm tenacity speaks to his resolve.
His knowledge base as an experienced and renowned internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, combined with perseverence to publish in the face of censorship, has led to more than 50 publications on COVID-19 listed on PubMed.
He has been, and continues to be, uniquely qualified to dismantle the distortions of the myocarditis brain-worms.
His ability to synthesize and cite the relevant science is truly formidible, and his knowledge and recall is, in a word, encyclopedic.
The public discourse is profoundly enriched by Dr. McCullough’s scholarship.
McCullough’s talk at the IPAK-EDU Director’s Science Webinar concisely presented the published scientific evidence as it stands, effectively deconstructing the efforts to underplay and distort the reality of heart injury induced by the COVID injectable products.
Watch these short cuts from his talk as Dr. McCullough breaks it down.
Does COVID-19 cause myocarditis?
Do the COVID-19 “vaccines” induce myocarditis?
Is myocarditis after taking the COVID-19 jabs ‘rare’?
Is post-jab myocarditis a serious condition?
Myocarditis in children: Heart damage and long-term risk
The harm is real and not rare.
It’s the shots.
To be continued!
Subscribe for more clips from the full talk. Stay tuned.
Information wants to be free—and over 90% of the content here is accessible to anyone. But everything takes care and time. If you like what you see, and you’re willing and able, consider leaving a tip. Every a little bit helps. Thank you!
Follow Dr. Peter McCullough on Substack and at petermcculloughmd.com
Paid subscribers to Twisting Strands will get access to a growing catalog of video shorts for an easy-to-watch, deeper perspective. Consider upgrading your subscription—you’ll be glad you did.
Subscribers to the IPAK-EDU Director’s Science Webinar get full access to webinar recordings, including this session with Dr. Peter McCullough
Your support of the webinar and IPAK-EDU makes this possible!
The "desired outcome" was always DEPOPULATION.
The coverup is evidence of MENS REA.